View Full Version: Challenge = C 000000000000... please, please help

camerahacks >>Questions >>Challenge = C 000000000000... please, please help


<< Prev | Next >>

theRIAA- 01-15-2008
Challenge = C 000000000000... please, please help
iv'e never done this before, but iv'e managed to finialy get all the drivers installed, and everything working. but my challenge from OPS v0.13 is S YourNameHere C 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 R 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 R 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 R 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 R 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Camera revision retrieved from camcorder: 33.21 <......>Sorry, your camcorder can not be unlocked with any known method. from rite-aid, and it's model 220 any ideas? iv'e found this problem in the forums, but no answer...

Anonymous- 01-15-2008

...

bobbarker- 01-15-2008

If that doesn't work check your cable, getting back all zeros is a sign of a bad one.

theRIAA- 01-15-2008
THANK YOU!
update to the newest version of ops.......you are about 9 versions off i went to ops .23 and got a much more numbery string, worked with burning man, and i just downloaded a video. ops .23 is all i could find, but the ops post talks about an ops .3,.4,.5, couldent find them anywhere... this is working, so i dont know if i need a newer one, or are they more brick proof? thanks again!

Amyn- 01-15-2008
Re: THANK YOU!
update to the newest version of ops.......you are about 9 versions off i went to ops .23 and got a much more numbery string, worked with burning man, and i just downloaded a video. ops .23 is all i could find, but the ops post talks about an ops .3,.4,.5, couldent find them anywhere... this is working, so i dont know if i need a newer one, or are they more brick proof? thanks again! Ops 0.23 is the las-*test*-('"). Previous versions are .01-.22 EDIT: Scratch that. See my post in that thread. Hold on a minute. After seeing forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=6511>this thread: update to the newest version of ops.......you are about 9 versions off i went to ops .23 and got a much more numbery string, worked with burning man, and i just downloaded a video. ops .23 is all i could find, but the ops post talks about an ops .3,.4,.5, couldent find them anywhere... this is working, so i dont know if i need a newer one, or are they more brick proof? thanks again! Am I late to notice this, or has everyone overlooked that BillW jumped from Ops v0.9 to Ops v0.10? Obviously, 0.10 < 0.9 <0.90> And now we've gone all the way up to v0.23. Seeing v0.3 and v0.4 instead of v0.03 and v0.04 can surely be confusing to noobs. So the question is: Are we on Ops v0.23 or Ops v2.3? The numbering is messed up, but Ops v0.23 is the las-*test*-('") version, v0.1-0.9 should be v0.01-0.09 or is Ops v0.23 supposed to be v2.3?

theRIAA- 01-16-2008

lol, who was in charge of that?

BillW- 01-16-2008

I was, and it's not "messed up". Most developers don't treat version numbers as decimal numbers... Quoth the wikipedia:There are two schools of thought regarding how numeric version numbers are incremented: Most free software packages treat numbers as a continuous stream, therefore a free software or open source product may have version numbers 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.8.1, 1.9.0, 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1.11.1, 1.11.2, etc. An example of such a software package is MediaWiki. However, a small minority of programs, particularly closed-source programs for Windows or other platforms, treat version numbers in another way, and may have version numbers such as 1.8, 1.9, 1.91, 1.92, etc

SaturnNiGHTS- 01-16-2008

from the applications thread: Hold on a minute. After seeing forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=6511>this thread: update to the newest version of ops.......you are about 9 versions off i went to ops .23 and got a much more numbery string, worked with burning man, and i just downloaded a video. ops .23 is all i could find, but the ops post talks about an ops .3,.4,.5, couldent find them anywhere... this is working, so i dont know if i need a newer one, or are they more brick proof? thanks again! Am I late to notice this, or has everyone overlooked that BillW jumped from Ops v0.9 to Ops v0.10? Obviously, 0.10 < 0.9 <0.90> And now we've gone all the way up to v0.23. Seeing v0.3 and v0.4 instead of v0.03 and v0.04 can surely be confusing to noobs. So the question is: Are we on Ops v0.23 or Ops v2.3? i know with both visual studio and kdevelop, the version numbering starts you out at "0.1". so i'm sure billw did just that...increment the minor number. i've done this also, with avidownload. i just haven't reached 10 yet. although, personally, i feel at that point, 1.0 would be sufficient. i don't feel ops has reached 1.0 status yet, though. we're not the only one to do this. for example, linus torvalds versions the linux kernel similar. (major).(stable/unstable).(minor). 2.6.21 > 2.6.8. if at all in doubt, i feel people should do the most logical thing...look at the one most recently posted. ops 0.23 is posted the la-*test*-('") in this thread, and it's also the newest tree available on sourceforge. it's dated the la-*test*-('"), and also at the top of the list. i can't retroactively adjust this thread to post in the beginning with the newest download link, otherwise i would, for the sake of simplicity.

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.